Tactical insights for first-time founders to outsmart the burn, the churn & the breakdown.

Hey Founder,

After 12 years working 1:1 with founders, here’s what derails startups more than pricing, runway, or even product:

The co-founder relationship.

Not in headline-grabbing explosions - but in slow, quiet breakdowns. Misalignment. Equity deadlock. Team confusion. Decisions frozen in place. It’s no wonder 65% of startup failures trace back to co-founder conflict.

So the real question isn’t “How do I find a co-founder?”

It’s “How do I choose, structure, and stress-test the most expensive relationship in my business?”

Let’s unpack that.

In one of my early startup roles, I joined a company led by two best friends: Harvard grads, great chemistry… perfect founding story.

For four years, they built side-by-side, until one quietly vanished, no announcement, no drama. Just… gone.

Why? They were never aligned on why they were building.

One saw it as his life’s mission. The other? Just one bet in a portfolio. That quiet misalignment turned into resentment and eventually, a breakup that wrecked the friendship and left the team scrambling.

This isn’t rare. You see it in the stories we all know.

Whitney Wolfe Herd at Tinder.

She named the company, drove early growth, and helped shape its DNA. But as the only female cofounder, she was sidelined, under-credited, and treated like “marketing.” What followed? A public split, a lawsuit, and then Bumble, the company that fixed everything Tinder missed and took a massive chunk of its market.

Reggie Brown at Snapchat.

He came up with the disappearing photo idea, designed the ghost logo, then got squeezed out. Years of legal battles followed. The settlement? A reported nine figures. The real cost? Focus, trust, reputation.

Same root cause in all of them:
No honest conversation about expectations, equity, and power, before things got serious.

Cofounder blowups rarely happen because you picked the wrong person; they happen because you didn’t design the relationship on purpose.

The patterns are predictable:

→ Rushing in from panic or hype.

You’re excited. Or scared to build alone. So you grab the friend, the ex-colleague, the loudest person in the room.

→ Skipping the “boring” stuff.

Roles, equity, vesting, CEO rights, exit plans, left vague because “We’re friends. We’ll sort it later.”

→ Avoiding the hard conversations.

You don’t stress-test your values, working styles, goals, or timelines. It feels awkward, so you don’t.

And that’s how it falls apart, not with a big argument, but with quiet resentment, drifting priorities, and two people building entirely different companies under the same name.

YC says it well: a cofounder is a 10-year relationship. But that still undersells it.

You're not just choosing someone to brainstorm with, you’re choosing the operating system your company will run on. Their decision-making style, emotional regulation, conflict habits, and sense of ownership will quietly shape everything: your pace, your team, your investor trust, and your culture.

This isn’t about finding a “perfect partner”, it’s about designing the relationship before it designs the company and getting that design in writing.

So, how do you do it?

Before you commit, walk through real failure scenarios together: What happens when a deal falls through, or one of you wants to quit, or public backlash hits?

If you can’t have one hard conversation now, how will you navigate 10 years of them?

Before the lawyers come in, write a founder memo together: Who’s the CEO? Who decides what? What happens if someone leaves?

Draft it like two grown-ups running a real company. Then legalize it.

Before you share a cap table, ship something together.

Not a brainstorm. A pilot. A sales process. A live product.

You’ll learn more about how someone handles pressure, follow-through, and disagreement in 30 days of doing than 10 hours of talking.

Co‑founders are like a two‑person crew on the same plane. You can’t just trust the autopilot and hope. You must communicate time-to-time.

Once a month, make space for a short “retro”:
What’s working? What’s frustrating? What are we avoiding?

Force one small change every time. Don’t wait for resentment to compound.

If no one clears the bar on integrity, competence, and alignment, don’t dilute your cap table to avoid feeling alone.

Got this in my DMs last week:

Here’s the rule: Don’t freeze your growth, but don’t shock your base either.

Segment, don’t generalize:

The goal: raise prices without raising eyebrows.

Send it my way, just hit reply.

A few early holiday gifts for founders this week:

Before you go…

Early-stage founders move fast by necessity, but long-term builders optimize for something else: resilience.

Choosing a cofounder is the first real org decision you make.

If that foundation is shaky, no growth hack, term sheet, or team offsite will hold the rest together.

But get it right and it becomes a quiet, compounding advantage.

That’s your moat.

See you next Thursday,

— Mariya

Hit reply and let me know. I read every single one (for real).

Hey, I’m Mariya, a startup CFO and founder of FounderFirst. After 10 years working alongside founders at early and growth-stage startups, I know how tough it is to make the right calls when resources are tight and the stakes are high. I started this newsletter to share the practical playbook I wish every founder had from day one, packed with lessons I’ve learned (and mistakes I’ve made) helping teams scale.

Mariya Valeva

Find me on LinkedIn